Federal Sentencing Guidlines for OrganizationsThe U.S. Federal Sentencing Commission was established in 1984 to sentence guidelines for offenders convicted of federal crimes. It comprises of 8 chapters, 8th being Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations (FSGO) which promotes ethical behavior and frightened every corporation who was committing business crimes because the laws were so made that the corporations would fall into the penalties of FSGO. Penalties under FSGO include monetary fines, organizational probation, and the implementation of an operational program to bring the organization into compliance with FSGO standards.
|
MONETARY FINES UNDER THE FGSO:
• Step 1. Determination of the “Base Line”
• Step 2. The Culpability Score which had aggravating factors and mitigating factors • Step 3. Determining the Total Fine Amount |
ORGANIZATIONAL PROBATION
• Reporting progress in the implementation of a compliance program
• Reporting about the implementations and the business’s conditions about the unannounced examinations of every transaction. |
COMPLIANCE PROGRAM 7 steps
• Management oversight
• Corporate policies • Communication of standards and procedures • Compliance with standards and procedures • Delegation of substantial discretionary authority • Consistent discipline • Response and corrective action |
Revised Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations (2004)
In May 2004, the U.S. Sentencing Commission pro- posed to Congress that there should be modifications to the 1991 guidelines. They made three major changes in November 2004.
1. The companies were required to evaluate the effectiveness of the compliance assuming substantial risk of failure.
2. The guidelines were to evidently support the ethical conduct rather than it just being a legal obligation which was found to be pretty much effective.
3. The guidelines defined accountability clearly besides this they were required to have training within the organization to promote ethical conduct.
1. The companies were required to evaluate the effectiveness of the compliance assuming substantial risk of failure.
2. The guidelines were to evidently support the ethical conduct rather than it just being a legal obligation which was found to be pretty much effective.
3. The guidelines defined accountability clearly besides this they were required to have training within the organization to promote ethical conduct.
Ghillyer, A. 2014. Business Ethics Now: Chapter 6, The Role Of Government. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Education